
A brief followup on my impeachment post. The rules of evidence. My post, somewhat noticeably, didn't mention them. That was intentional. If you take one thing away from my post it should be that the mechanic of impeachment is something you need to practice and learn the same way you learn to throw a baseball or to play scales on the piano. And just like you wouldn't focus on the laws of physics when learning to throw or on music theory when learning scales, you shouldn't worry about the rules of evidence when learning the skill of impeachment. Just practice.
But that said, at some point, you should be aware of the rules of evidence that govern impeachment with prior statements.
There are three critical ones (in the Federal Rules of Evidence):
These aren't the only evidence rules that matter. There are some other hearsay exemptions and exceptions that often apply to impeachment materials, e.g., statement of a party-opponent, business record, recorded recollection, but these depend on the specific materials. And technically, Rules 607 and 611 govern the mechanics of impeachment as well.
.png)
Align, the only digital case binder platform built by a trial lawyer focused exclusively on litigation, is transforming litigation workflows in leading law firms—from boutique practices to AmLaw 100 powerhouses.