Licenses go unused, practice groups adopt tools on their own, and few firms can say whether the spend is paying off.
Litigation adds its own risks, from hallucinated citations to tools that slow down trial preparation.
Recommendations your leadership can act on, with priorities and the measures to track them.
The assessment works at the firm level with the stakeholders you designate. Scope and work product are set with your firm at the start. Firms that want hands-on work inside individual case teams choose AI Integration.
Two decades in the courtroom
Align's founder and CEO, Sam Davidoff, tried cases before juries, judges and arbitration panels as a partner at Williams & Connolly, where he chaired the firm's technology committee.
Software running in Am Law 100 firms
Align Binders is deployed at multiple Am Law 100 firms. Align Research runs on a multistage AI pipeline designed and tested in house.
Published and teaching
Align's founder publishes on AI and litigation in Legaltech News and Attorney at Work and teaches CLE on AI for litigators.
Questions & Answers
Still have questions? Reach out to our team!
Where should a law firm start with AI?
Start with an inventory of what the firm already licenses and how lawyers actually use it. From there, sort use cases by where AI helps, where it makes no difference and where it adds risk.
How does an AI strategy assessment differ from AI integration?
The assessment works with firm leadership and the technology committee to set direction. Integration embeds with case teams on live matters to test, select and roll out tools.
Align advises law firms on AI strategy and builds custom AI and litigation software, including Align Binders and Align Research.
